Reply to Emancipation Memorial Presented by Chicago
Christians of All Denominations [1]
September 13, 1862
“The subject
presented in the memorial is one upon which I have thought much for weeks past,
and I may even say for months. I am approached with the most opposite opinions
and advice, and that by religious men, who are equally certain that they
represent the Divine will. I am sure that either the one or the other class is
mistaken in that belief, and perhaps in some respects both. I hope it will not
be irreverent for me to say that if it is probable that God would reveal his
will to others, on a point so connected with my duty, it might be supposed he
would reveal it directly to me; for, unless I am more deceived in myself than I
often am, it is my earnest desire to know the will of Providence in this
matter. And if I can learn what it is I will do it! These are not,
however, the days of miracles, and I suppose it will be granted that I am not
to expect a direct revelation. I must study the plain physical facts of the
case, ascertain what is possible and learn what appears to be wise and right.
The subject is difficult, and good men do not agree. For instance, the other
day four gentlemen of standing and intelligence (naming one or two of the
number) from New York called, as a delegation, on business connected with the
war; but, before leaving, two of them earnestly beset me to proclaim general
emancipation, upon which the other two at once attacked them! You know, also,
that the last session of Congress had a decided majority of anti-slavery men,
yet they could not unite on this policy. And the same is true of the religious
people. Why, the rebel soldiers are praying with a great deal more earnestness,
I fear, than our own troops, and expecting God to favor their side; for one of
our soldiers, who had been taken prisoner, told Senator Wilson, a few days
since, that he met with nothing so discouraging as the evident sincerity of
those he was among in their prayers. But we will talk over the merits of the
case.
``What good
would a proclamation of emancipation from me do, especially as we are now
situated? I do not want to issue a document that the whole world will see must
necessarily be inoperative, like the Pope's bull against the comet! Would my
word free the slaves, when I cannot even enforce the Constitution in the
rebel States? Is there a single court, or magistrate, or individual that would
be influenced by it there? And what reason is there to think it would have any
greater effect upon the slaves than the late law of Congress, which I approved,
and which offers protection and freedom to the slaves of rebel masters who come
within our lines? Yet I cannot learn that that law has caused a single slave to
come over to us. And suppose they could be induced by a proclamation of freedom
from me to throw themselves upon us, what should we do with them? How
can we feed and care for such a multitude? Gen. Butler wrote me a few days
since that he was issuing more rations to the slaves who have rushed to him
than to all the white troops under his command. They eat, and that is
all, though it is true Gen. Butler is feeding the whites also by the thousand;
for it nearly amounts to a famine there. If, now, the pressure of the war
should call off our forces from New Orleans to defend some other point, what is
to prevent the masters from reducing the blacks to slavery again; for I am told
that whenever the rebels take any black prisoners, free or slave, they
immediately auction them off! They did so with those they took from a boat that
was aground in the Tennessee river a few days ago. And then I am very
ungenerously attacked for it! For instance, when, after the late battles at
and near Bull Run, an expedition went out from Washington under a flag of truce
to bury the dead and bring in the wounded, and the rebels seized the blacks who
went along to help and sent them into slavery, Horace Greeley said in his paper
that the Government would probably do nothing about it. What could I do?
[Here your delegation suggested that this was a gross outrage on a flag of
truce, which covers and protects all over which it waves, and that whatever he
could do if white men had been similarly detained he could do in
this case.]
``Now, then, tell
me, if you please, what possible result of good would follow the issuing of
such a proclamation as you desire? Understand, I raise no objections against it
on legal or constitutional grounds; for, as commander-in-chief of the army and
navy, in time of war, I suppose I have a right to take any measure which may
best subdue the enemy. Nor do I urge objections of a moral nature, in view of
possible consequences of insurrection and massacre at the South. I view the
matter as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the
advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion.”
Thus invited,
your delegation very willingly made reply to the following effect; it being
understood that a portion of the remarks were intermingled by the way of
conversation with those of the President just given.
We observed (taking
up the President's ideas in order) that good men indeed differed in their
opinions on this subject; nevertheless the truth was somewhere, and it
was a matter of solemn moment for him to ascertain it; that we had not been so
wanting in respect, alike to ourselves and to him, as to come a thousand miles
to bring merely our opinion to be set over against the opinion of
other parties; that the memorial contained facts, principles, and arguments
which appealed to the intelligence of the President and to his faith in Divine
Providence; that he could not deny that the Bible denounced oppression as one
of the highest of crimes, and threatened Divine judgments against nations that
practice it; that our country had been exceedingly guilty in this respect, both
at the North and South; that our just punishment has come by a slaveholder's
rebellion; that the virus of secession is found wherever the virus of slavery
extends, and no farther; so that there is the amplest reason for expecting to
avert Divine judgments by putting away the sin, and for hoping to remedy the
national troubles by striking at their cause.
We observed,
further, that we freely admitted the probability, and even the certainty, that
God would reveal the path of duty to the President as well as to others,
provided he sought to learn it in the appointed way; but, as according to his
own remark, Providence wrought by means and not miraculously, it might be, God
would use the suggestions and arguments of other minds to secure that result.
We felt the deepest personal interest in the matter as of national concern, and
would fain aid the thoughts of our President by communicating the convictions
of the Christian community from which we came, with the ground upon which they
were based.
That it was true
he could not now enforce the Constitution at the South; but we could see in
that fact no reason whatever for not proclaiming emancipation, but rather the
contrary. The two appealed to different classes; the latter would aid, and in
truth was necessary to re-establish the former; and the two could be made
operative together as fast as our armies fought their way southward; while we
had yet to hear that he proposed to abandon the Constitution because of the
present difficulty of enforcing it.
As to the
inability of Congress to agree on this policy at the late session, it was quite
possible, in view of subsequent events, there might be more unanimity at
another meeting. The members have met their constituents and learned of
marvellous conversions to the wisdom of emancipation, especially since late
reverses have awakened thought as to the extreme peril of the nation, and made
bad men as well as good men realize that we have to deal with God in this
matter. Men of the most opposite previous views were now uniting in calling for
this measure.
That to proclaim
emancipation would secure the sympathy of Europe and the whole civilized world,
which now saw no other reason for the strife than national pride and ambition,
an unwillingness to abridge our domain and power. No other step would be so
potent to prevent foreign intervention.
Furthermore, it
would send a thrill through the entire North, firing every patriotic heart,
giving the people a glorious principle for which to suffer and to fight, and
assuring them that the work was to be so thoroughly done as to leave our
country free forever from danger and disgrace in this quarter.
We added, that
when the proclamation should become widely known (as the law of Congress has not
been) it would withdraw the slaves from the rebels, leaving them without
laborers, and giving us both laborers and soldiers. That the difficulty
experienced by Gen. Butler and other Generals arose from the fact that half-way
measures could never avail. It is the inherent vice of half-way measures
that they create as many difficulties as they remove. It is folly merely to
receive and feed the slaves. They should be welcomed and fed, and then,
according to Paul's doctrine, that they who eat must work, be made to labor and
to fight for their liberty and ours. With such a policy the blacks would be no
incumbrance and their rations no waste. In this respect we should follow the
ancient maxim, and learn of the enemy. What the rebels most fear is what we
should be most prompt to do; and what they most fear is evident from the hot
haste with which, on the first day of the present session of the Rebel
Congress, bills were introduced threatening terrible vengeance if we used the
blacks in the war.
The President
rejoined from time to time in about these terms:
“I admit that
slavery is the root of the rebellion, or at least its sine qua non. The
ambition of politicians may have instigated them to act, but they would have
been impotent without slavery as their instrument. I will also concede that
emancipation would help us in Europe, and convince them that we are incited by
something more than ambition. I grant further that it would help somewhat
at the North, though not so much, I fear, as you and those you represent
imagine. Still, some additional strength would be added in that way to the war.
And then unquestionably it would weaken the rebels by drawing off their
laborers, which is of great importance. But I am not so sure we could do much
with the blacks. If we were to arm them, I fear that in a few weeks the arms would
be in the hands of the rebels; and indeed thus far we have not had arms enough
to equip our white troops. I will mention another thing, though it meet only
your scorn and contempt: There are fifty thousand bayonets in the Union armies
from the Border Slave States. It would be a serious matter if, in consequence
of a proclamation such as you desire, they should go over to the rebels. I do
not think they all would---not so many indeed as a year ago, or as six months
ago---not so many to-day as yesterday. Every day increases their Union feeling.
They are also getting their pride enlisted, and want to beat the rebels. Let me
say one thing more: I think you should admit that we already have an important
principle to rally and unite the people in the fact that constitutional
government is at stake. This is a fundamental idea, going down about as deep as
any thing.”
We answered that,
being fresh from the people, we were naturally more hopeful than himself as to
the necessity and probable effect of such a proclamation. The value of
constitutional government is indeed a grand idea for which to contend; but the
people know that nothing else has put constitutional government in danger
but slavery; that the toleration of that aristocratic and despotic element
among our free institutions was the inconsistency that had nearly wrought our
ruin and caused free government to appear a failure before the world, and
therefore the people demand emancipation to preserve and perpetuate
constitutional government. Our idea would thus be found to go deeper than this,
and to be armed with corresponding power. (“Yes,”' interrupted Mr. Lincoln, “that
is the true ground of our difficulties.”) That a proclamation of general
emancipation, “giving Liberty and Union” as the national watch-word, would
rouse the people and rally them to his support beyond any thing yet
witnessed---appealing alike to conscience, sentiment, and hope. He must
remember, too, that present manifestations are no idex of what would then take
place. If the leader will but utter a trumpet call the nation will respond with
patriotic ardor. No one can tell the power of the right word from the right man
to develop the latent fire and enthusiasm of the masses. (“I know it,”
exclaimed Mr. Lincoln.) That good sense must of course be exercised in
drilling, arming, and using black as well as white troops to make them
efficient; and that in a scarcity of arms it was at least worthy of inquiry
whether it were not wise to place a portion of them in the hands of those
nearest to the seat of the rebellion and able to strike the deadliest blow.
That in case of a
proclamation of emancipation we had no fear of serious injury from the
desertion of Border State troops. The danger was greatly diminished, as the
President had admitted. But let the desertions be what they might, the
increased spirit of the North would replace them two to one. One State alone,
if necessary, would compensate the loss, were the whole 50,000 to join the
enemy. The struggle has gone too far, and cost too much treasure and blood, to
allow of a partial settlement. Let the line be drawn at the same time between
freedom and slavery, and between loyalty and treason. The sooner we know who
are our enemies the better.
In bringing our
interview to a close, after an hour of earnest and frank discussion, of which
the foregoing is a specimen, Mr. Lincoln remarked: “Do not misunderstand me,
because I have mentioned these objections. They indicate the difficulties that
have thus far prevented my action in some such way as you desire. I have not
decided against a proclamation of liberty to the slaves, but hold the matter
under advisement. And I can assure you that the subject is on my mind, by day
and night, more than any other. Whatever shall appear to be God's will I will
do. I trust that, in the freedom with which I have canvassed your views, I have
not in any respect injured your feelings.”
Annotation
[1]
Chicago Tribune, September 23, and National Intelligencer,
September 26, 1862. Reverend William W. Patton and Reverend John Dempster
composed the delegation which presented the president with a memorial in favor
of national emancipation adopted by a public meeting of Christians of all
denominations held in Bryan Hall, Chicago, on September 7. The delegation also
presented a similar memorial in German signed by German citizens of Chicago. On
September 20 following their visit to Washington, the delegates reported to a
meeting in Bryan Hall. This report dated September 21, and signed by Patton and
Dempster provides the present text, which includes all of Lincoln's remarks as
quoted.
Source: Basler, Collected Works, Vol. V, pp.
419-425. [Downloaded 4/27/2015 from http://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/.]